Current web applications include unprecedented levels of sophistication. Users want more than static text and pictures; they want to be able to do things within the app and with other users, and they want it all to work as smoothly as a desktop program. Because of the increased difficulty in creating these kinds of sites, testing teams worldwide must put in a lot more time and energy to guarantee that they function as intended. Therefore, if you want your web app to work well for current and potential users, you need to put it through extensive testing.
It’s not uncommon for businesses to have QA departments whose sole responsibility is to do thorough, manual checks of their software for bugs. This method, however, is laborious and prone to mistakes when applied to huge applications with numerous features. Today, mobile app test automation is being adopted by the vast majority of application development companies. These QA teams may allocate more time to high-value activities like exploratory testing by automating the more mundane aspects of the testing process. Of course, manual testing will never be obsolete, but the needs and expectations of today’s software development industry make automated testing a necessity.
What is regression automation?
Automated regression testing is a software testing method used to verify that an application retains its original functionality after being modified to include new features or revised code. This automation is often used to automate the implementation of processes, plans, scripts, and other activities inside the software regression testing approach.
Automated regression testing spans various activities, from verifying that the program was compiled successfully after an update to running through the workflow and looking for functional issues. All additional elements are checked for broken bits after an update as well. It is usual practice to investigate the software testing criteria, the test strategy, and the modifications made to the product and its functionality before beginning automated regression testing.
What is Progressive automation?
Progressive automation is a type of automation methodology in which test modules are executed sequentially. For more efficient testing, early bug detection, and quick repairs, progressive automation advocates writing automated test scripts simultaneously with the development code. These scripts are mainly used for verifying the functionality of brand-new programs.
Thankfully, the paradigm change is happening, at least in part, as a result of growing automation. Instead of weeks of manual testing, a progressive automation suite can be run in only a few days, and hundreds of test cases may be performed all at once. This capability helps businesses reduce testing cycles and expand test coverage regarding requirements. Because of this, problems with new features or upgrades to an existing system can be found considerably upfront in the development process.
What is the importance of progression automation?
The next question was which tasks should be automated and which ones should not. IT professionals have been using automated testing for years. The point of using automated testing tools instead of performing test runs manually is to reduce the time required to run tests. To gain a good ROI from the time spent writing automation scripts, automating tasks for which the application’s functionality does not change frequently is the better way. As a result, in the past, automation mainly focused on finding the regression suite and automating the tests that seldom changed.
However, in the modern day, programs must respond rapidly to changes in the needs of their users. Time spent on development has been cut from months to days. Continuous testing and deployment are fast becoming the standard in the commercial world because of the rise of DevOps. Progressive automation dresses these changes.
How does progressive automation improve the entire testing process?
The progressive test simultaneously focuses on two other aspects besides creating tests for new features.
- Exploratory testing
- Bug Hunt
Exploratory Testing
Modern software programs are among the most intricate things. Therefore, a user frequently uses millions of methods to traverse the program. Idealistically, a tester should test each of these, but given the time limits, this is just impossible. So first, they must ensure that they are testing the most complex components. This is where exploratory testing is performed. Here, an experienced tester uses the knowledge of the program and known flaws to attempt to cause issues. For example, checking the behavior of a mobile application when switching from cellular data to WiFi.
Bug hunting
The culmination of progression testing is the pursuit of new bugs. Too frequently, users are the first to discover an issue. They may submit a bug report or contact the support team. However, only the application and system logs will often reveal the issue’s existence. Here, the priority is determining the actions required to reproduce the problem. Once these are identified, engineers have a clear target for debugging. And this is the final step of the progressive test.
In the end, progression tests are added to the regression test suite. For instance, once a defect has been detected, it must be retested in the future. This applies to both issues discovered during testing. Thus, tests designed for new features are transformed into regression tests for current features. Now automating the entire will be the best option. So that they can solve the bottlenecks, the apps have right now and will have in the future. The regression automation tool and progressive test automation together expedite the testing process.
Conclusion
Rarely are advanced testing automated, as new features are inherently less stable. The more recent the addition, the greater the likelihood that engineers may make last-minute adjustments. Perhaps the product manager changes her mind about the design or placement of a button during development. Or, during beta testing, buyers suggest a completely new button design. However, the HeadSpin test automation platform is resistant to such modifications. Thus there is no need to delay automating the testing. Multiple tests can be run partially without an emulator or simulator, and even the tests can be scheduled.
Also read know more about eveningchronicle
